In
reading the Gospels, one of the consistencies is how Jesus has no hesitation in
asking difficult questions. "Who touched me?" and "Who do you
say that I am?" and "Who are my brothers?" and "Why are you
sleeping?" - they are abundant, and are intended to start conversations.
Events
I attended on Tuesday were equally full of difficult questions. One side event
addressed empowering women across the humanitarian development nexus, and
challenged several high-level officials in intersectional areas of
gender/rural/humanitarian response. The key messages included accountability,
partnership, multi-year and flexible funding, disaggregate data, and capacity
building. The moderator held nothing back as she pressed for commitments beyond
easy abstract statements. It was a delightfully honest and refreshing
conversation, with an inspiring message to all agencies (governmental and NGOs)
to break down silos and work collaboratively in meaningful ways. UN Women ED
Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka encouraged us further when
she concluded: "My biggest wish is that we take this conversation to the
people who are not in this room, who have power." While progress is
possible, how we will accomplish these intentions are difficult questions.
A
parallel event examined the challenges of making gender-friendly cities for
rural and/or indigenous migrants following the PPPS model (identify the
Problem, develop useful Policy, create effective Program, and formulate
Services to deliver the best response.) We were asked to consider how we might
implement such a model in our own contexts - a difficult question.
Another
side event embraced the newly articulated overlap of rights to information and
gender equality, identifying difficult questions such as how NGOs might
collaborate to reduce the disparity of women and men accessing internet (250
million), the risks and possible backlashes of political, social, and economic
perspective, the reality of biased information (fake news), the importance of
data and transparency, and the reality of NGO involvement in the regulation of
information (not the previous focus on universal access).
In
the midst of these difficult questions, we (as NGOs) continue to track
developments in the CSW negotiations, and advocate for positive change in the
draft. Tracking changes to consider implications in such areas as water,
transportation, political agency all raise many difficult questions; they
inspire many engaging conversation.
And
as the Anglican Communion Delegation, we are raising our own difficult
questions. As we begin preparations for our statement to the Anglican Consultative
Council, we are asking ourselves what issues raised in our time together are
most meaningful, and how our faith plays a role in our understanding of those
issues, and how these issues impact our faith and actions. They are difficult
questions that anyone could ask themselves at any time, as they journey forward
in faith.
Difficult
questions are not something we should shy away from; just as Jesus' disciples
did not shy away from them. Instead, we can see them as the opportunity to
engage more deeply in the matters of the day, in the issues that impact our
lives. They provide us the beginning of meaningful conversation, and they
encourage us to intentionally reflect on how our faith is a big part of those
conversations. I hope we are never so intimidated by difficult questions that
we fail to recognise the gift that we are given to deepen our faith. Jesus
never asked more than could be pondered; this remains our truth today.
No comments:
Post a Comment